Since I think this was more of a GCP-related question, I have asked on
Stackoverflow in the meantime:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60584349/any-idea-why-this-port-is-not-reachable-from-another-gcp-instance


Kind regards,

Stéphane Thibaud

On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 9:27 PM Stéphane Thibaud <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Gianluca,
>
> Thank you very much for your answer. Strangely it does not accept the
> connection. I am indeed using an internal static IP. In the meantime I did
> a portscan from another GCP instance and it looks like the port shows as
> 'filtered'. Maybe it is indeed a GCP firewall problem, but I would expect
> the default firewall rules to expose the port.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Stéphane Thibaud
>
> 2020年3月1日(日) 19:35 Gianluca Bonetti <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hello Stéphane
>>
>> GCP should allow internal traffic using the internal IP address (static
>> or not), usually a 10.xxx.xxx.xxx, but should deny connections on special
>> ports using the external IP address (static or not).
>> If you need to use an external IP address you have to add a firewall
>> rule, but I think it would be fixed by using the internal IP addresses.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Gianluca Bonetti
>>
>> Il giorno dom 1 mar 2020 alle ore 08:39 Stéphane Thibaud <
>> [email protected]> ha scritto:
>>
>>> Hello Ignite users,,
>>>
>>> I suddenly am unable to connect to the Ignite instance. I am running it
>>> on GCP with Container OS/Docker. I checked by SSH-ing into the instance and
>>> running netstat that port 10800 is listening:
>>>
>>> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address           Foreign Address
>>>         State       PID/Program name
>>> ...
>>> tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:10800           0.0.0.0:*
>>>               LISTEN      -
>>> I have allocated a static IP to this instance and connecting to it
>>> previously worked (firewall rule should allow internal GCP connections).
>>> Now I get 'timeout' error even though I can ping the machine without
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> Any ideas for additional checks?
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Stéphane Thibaud
>>>
>>

Reply via email to