Hi Alex, thanks for the reply. But as our application is write/update intensive, we want a good performance/high availability application solution along with disk persistence.
In that case, what configuration would you suggest for the following case, 1. Disk storing functionality can run periodically and while that(checkpointing) is running it can be delayed to some extent but not too much delay/starvations. 2. Faster access to data is needed. Queries should run quicker. (which is actually happening now when checkpointing is not present). 3. All logical operations should be updated in WAL at any cost and even if we configure checkpointing to be done at an interval of 1hour per 1 checkpoint, WAL should have all those operations logged. 4. We are disabling WAL archiving. Is it needed if point 3 is the case? Thanks, Aditya. -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
