Correct: JDK8 to build, JDK11 to run.

BTW, you shouldn’t need to change the core product to do something like that. 
Not finished yet, but you might be able to get some ideas from here: 
https://github.com/sdarlington/ignite-vault

Regards,
Stephen

> On 29 May 2020, at 16:15, Debdatta Bhattacharjee 
> <debdatta.bhattachar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Stephen! Well, we had some local code changes done for Ignite where we 
> used write behind and for integrating Cassandra, the password was not 
> encrypted. So we had to change the code to integrate our own password 
> encryption/decryption strategy for which we need to build the code. 
> 
> 2.4 also had some other issues which were fixed in later version so I believe 
> we don't need those additional fixes anymore though...but code build is 
> certainly a need for us, this is what we do for 2.4 version as well. 
> 
> So if I understand correctly, you are saying that it should work fine with 
> OpenJDK 11 runtime, but for build, it would still need Oracle JDK 8? 
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 8:29 PM Stephen Darlington 
> <stephen.darling...@gridgain.com <mailto:stephen.darling...@gridgain.com>> 
> wrote:
> You can run it using JDK11 but it currently only builds with JDK8.
> 
> Unless you’re developing Ignite itself, there’s generally not much need to 
> actually build Ignite yourself. I normally just use the downloads from Maven 
> and I often use JDK11.
> 
> Regards,
> Stephen
> 
>> On 29 May 2020, at 15:28, Debdatta Bhattacharjee 
>> <debdatta.bhattachar...@gmail.com <mailto:debdatta.bhattachar...@gmail.com>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello there,
>> 
>> Looking at the below link: 
>> 
>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/getting-started 
>> <https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/getting-started>  
>> 
>> It says Ignite 2.8.1 is officially tested on Open JDK 8 and above. 
>> Does this mean it is tested on Open JDK 11 as well? I would assume that it 
>> is tested with Open JDK 8 runtime. 
>> Can Ignite be built from source using Open JDK 8 or Open JDK 11? I am 
>> specifically stressing on OpenJDK 11 since it is expected to be the most 
>> stable version. 
>> Any help would be greatly appreciated!
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>> Debdatta Bhattacharjee.
>> ==============================
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Debdatta Bhattacharjee.
> ==============================


Reply via email to