Hi Evgenii, same folder shared stdout.copy

Just in case:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ejcddp2gcml8qz2/AAD_VfUecE0hSNZX7wGbfDh3a?dl=0

On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 21:23, Evgenii Zhuravlev <[email protected]>
wrote:

> No, it's not. It's not clear when it happened and what was with the
> cluster and the client node itself at this moment.
>
> Evgenii
>
> ср, 24 июн. 2020 г. в 18:16, John Smith <[email protected]>:
>
>> Ok I'll try... The stack trace isn't enough?
>>
>> On Wed., Jun. 24, 2020, 4:30 p.m. Evgenii Zhuravlev, <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> John, right, didn't notice them before. Can you share the full log for
>>> the client node with an issue?
>>>
>>> Evgenii
>>>
>>> ср, 24 июн. 2020 г. в 12:29, John Smith <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> I thought I did! The link doesn't have them?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed., Jun. 24, 2020, 2:43 p.m. Evgenii Zhuravlev, <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Can you share full log files from server nodes?
>>>>>
>>>>> ср, 24 июн. 2020 г. в 10:47, John Smith <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The logs for server are here:
>>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ejcddp2gcml8qz2/AAD_VfUecE0hSNZX7wGbfDh3a?dl=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The error from the client:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> javax.cache.CacheException: class
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheInvalidStateException:
>>>>>> Failed to execute cache operation (all partition owners have left the 
>>>>>> grid,
>>>>>> partition data has been lost) [cacheName=cache1, part=580,
>>>>>> key=UserKeyCacheObjectImpl [part=580, val=14385045508, 
>>>>>> hasValBytes=false]]
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheUtils.convertToCacheException(GridCacheUtils.java:1337)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheFutureImpl.convertException(IgniteCacheFutureImpl.java:62)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.IgniteFutureImpl.get(IgniteFutureImpl.java:137)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.data.impl.IgniteCacheRepository.lambda$executeAsync$d94e711a$1(IgniteCacheRepository.java:55)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.AsyncFutureListener$1.run(AsyncFutureListener.java:53)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.data.impl.VertxIgniteExecutorAdapter.lambda$execute$0(VertxIgniteExecutorAdapter.java:18)
>>>>>> at io.vertx.core.impl.ContextImpl.executeTask(ContextImpl.java:369)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.vertx.core.impl.WorkerContext.lambda$wrapTask$0(WorkerContext.java:35)
>>>>>> at io.vertx.core.impl.TaskQueue.run(TaskQueue.java:76)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
>>>>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>>>>>> Caused by:
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheInvalidStateException:
>>>>>> Failed to execute cache operation (all partition owners have left the 
>>>>>> grid,
>>>>>> partition data has been lost) [cacheName=cache1, part=580,
>>>>>> key=UserKeyCacheObjectImpl [part=580, val=14385045508, 
>>>>>> hasValBytes=false]]
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTopologyFutureAdapter.validatePartitionOperation(GridDhtTopologyFutureAdapter.java:169)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTopologyFutureAdapter.validateCache(GridDhtTopologyFutureAdapter.java:116)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridPartitionedSingleGetFuture.init(GridPartitionedSingleGetFuture.java:208)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.atomic.GridDhtAtomicCache.getAsync0(GridDhtAtomicCache.java:1428)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.atomic.GridDhtAtomicCache.access$1600(GridDhtAtomicCache.java:135)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.atomic.GridDhtAtomicCache$16.apply(GridDhtAtomicCache.java:474)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.atomic.GridDhtAtomicCache$16.apply(GridDhtAtomicCache.java:472)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.atomic.GridDhtAtomicCache.asyncOp(GridDhtAtomicCache.java:761)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.atomic.GridDhtAtomicCache.getAsync(GridDhtAtomicCache.java:472)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAdapter.getAsync(GridCacheAdapter.java:4749)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAdapter.getAsync(GridCacheAdapter.java:1477)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheProxyImpl.getAsync(IgniteCacheProxyImpl.java:937)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GatewayProtectedCacheProxy.getAsync(GatewayProtectedCacheProxy.java:652)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.data.impl.IgniteCacheRepository.lambda$get$1(IgniteCacheRepository.java:28)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.data.impl.IgniteCacheRepository.executeAsync(IgniteCacheRepository.java:51)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.data.impl.IgniteCacheRepository.get(IgniteCacheRepository.java:28)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.impl.CarrierCodeServiceImpl.getCarrierIdOfPhone(CarrierCodeServiceImpl.java:65)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.impl.SmppGatewayServiceImpl.sendSms(SmppGatewayServiceImpl.java:39)
>>>>>> at com.xxxxxx.impl.MtEventProcessor.process(MtEventProcessor.java:46)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.kafka.impl.KafkaProcessorImpl.lambda$null$4(KafkaProcessorImpl.java:83)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableCreate.subscribeActual(CompletableCreate.java:39)
>>>>>> at io.reactivex.Completable.subscribe(Completable.java:2309)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableTimeout.subscribeActual(CompletableTimeout.java:53)
>>>>>> at io.reactivex.Completable.subscribe(Completable.java:2309)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletablePeek.subscribeActual(CompletablePeek.java:51)
>>>>>> at io.reactivex.Completable.subscribe(Completable.java:2309)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableResumeNext.subscribeActual(CompletableResumeNext.java:41)
>>>>>> at io.reactivex.Completable.subscribe(Completable.java:2309)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableToFlowable.subscribeActual(CompletableToFlowable.java:32)
>>>>>> at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14918)
>>>>>> at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14865)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFlatMap$MergeSubscriber.onNext(FlowableFlatMap.java:163)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFromIterable$IteratorSubscription.slowPath(FlowableFromIterable.java:236)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFromIterable$BaseRangeSubscription.request(FlowableFromIterable.java:124)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFlatMap$MergeSubscriber.drainLoop(FlowableFlatMap.java:546)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFlatMap$MergeSubscriber.drain(FlowableFlatMap.java:366)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFlatMap$InnerSubscriber.onComplete(FlowableFlatMap.java:678)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.observers.SubscriberCompletableObserver.onComplete(SubscriberCompletableObserver.java:33)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableResumeNext$ResumeNextObserver.onComplete(CompletableResumeNext.java:68)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletablePeek$CompletableObserverImplementation.onComplete(CompletablePeek.java:115)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableTimeout$TimeOutObserver.onComplete(CompletableTimeout.java:87)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableCreate$Emitter.onComplete(CompletableCreate.java:64)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.kafka.impl.KafkaProcessorImpl.lambda$null$3(KafkaProcessorImpl.java:86)
>>>>>> at io.vertx.core.impl.FutureImpl.dispatch(FutureImpl.java:105)
>>>>>> at io.vertx.core.impl.FutureImpl.tryComplete(FutureImpl.java:150)
>>>>>> at io.vertx.core.impl.FutureImpl.tryComplete(FutureImpl.java:157)
>>>>>> at io.vertx.core.impl.FutureImpl.complete(FutureImpl.java:118)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.impl.MtEventProcessor.lambda$process$0(MtEventProcessor.java:83)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.handleDispatchResponse(HttpContext.java:310)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.execute(HttpContext.java:297)
>>>>>> at io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.next(HttpContext.java:272)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.predicate.PredicateInterceptor.handle(PredicateInterceptor.java:69)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.predicate.PredicateInterceptor.handle(PredicateInterceptor.java:32)
>>>>>> at io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.next(HttpContext.java:269)
>>>>>> at io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.fire(HttpContext.java:279)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.dispatchResponse(HttpContext.java:240)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.lambda$null$2(HttpContext.java:370)
>>>>>> ... 7 common frames omitted
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 13:28, John Smith <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not sure about the wrong configuration... All the apps work this
>>>>>>> seems to happen every few weeks. We don't have any particular heavy 
>>>>>>> load.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just bounced the client application and the errors went away.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 12:57, Evgenii Zhuravlev <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It means that there are no nodes in the cluster that holds certain
>>>>>>>> partitions. So, probably you have a wrong configuration or some of the
>>>>>>>> nodes left the cluster and you don't have backups in the cluster for 
>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>> partitions. I believe more can be found from logs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Evgenii
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ср, 24 июн. 2020 г. в 09:52, John Smith <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also I'm assuming that the thin client wouldn't be susceptible to
>>>>>>>>> this error?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 12:38, John Smith <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The cluster is showing active when running control.sh
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But the client is showing "all partition owners have left the
>>>>>>>>>> grid"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The client node is marked as client=true so it's not a server
>>>>>>>>>> node.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is this split brain as well?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to