Good point. In some cases I use near cache. Maybe for the ones that don't
need it, I can use the thin client.

I'm looking to see what port and I.Ps are made available to the container
and see if I can set up address forwarding or whatever it's called.

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 11:35, Stephen Darlington <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, thick client nodes are peers, and so can both accept and initiate
> connections to and from other nodes.
>
> It’s often easier to get a thin-client to work under these circumstances,
> as they behave in a more traditional client-server manner. Is that a viable
> option?
>
> Regards,
> Stephen
>
> On 26 Jun 2020, at 16:28, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I have 3 server nodes deployed on VMs as far as they are concerned
> it's practically bare metal installation.
>
> My client nodes CLIENT=TRUE connect from within DC/OS Cluster using docker
> in either bridged network or closed DC/OS network. I.e: They are not
> visible to the network.
>
> In TCP/IP Discovery this seems to work no problem, client connects and I
> can do cache operations no problem.
>
> But does the server node ever attempt to connect back to the client node
> in any way?
> And do the clients need some kind special address resolution / port
> forwarding?
>
> I see there's a BasicAddressResolver class, but it's not really documented
> in the official docs.
>
>
> https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/javadoc/org/apache/ignite/configuration/BasicAddressResolver.html
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to