I am able to reproduce the problem - it occurs with any client, thick or thin.
With one node the transaction completes in a reasonable time, but with two nodes it is orders of magnitude slower. We'll investigate and get back to you. On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:48 AM jjimeno <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi again, > > As a test, I just disabled persistence in both nodes. The already > mentioned > transaction of 1.2 million keys and 600MB in size takes 298sec. > > Remember that for one single node and persistence enabled it takes 70sec, > so > just adding a second node makes the test more than 4 times slower. > > Is this, really, the performance that Ignite can offer? Please, don't take > me wrong, I'm just asking, not criticizing. I want to be sure I'm not > doing > anything wrong and the timings I get are the expected ones... > > Thanks! > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ >
