Hello! What is your baseline topology? Are both of your server nodes on it?
Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev чт, 1 апр. 2021 г. в 07:02, Charlin S <[email protected]>: > Hello, > Thanks for the reply. > Two servers are formed as cluster and the details as below > Topology snapshot [ver=262, locNode=99bfa50b, servers=2, clients=14, > state=ACTIVE, CPUs=188, offheap=64.0GB, heap=97.0GB] > > My code snippet in cache creation application > > *Step 1* - *Ignite grid instance creation on client node* > IgniteConfiguration igniteGridIg = new IgniteConfiguration(); > igniteGridIg.SpringConfigUrl = Path.Combine(igniteXmlfilePath); > IIgnite IgniteInstance = Ignition.Start( igniteGridIg ); > > *Step 2 - Cache creation* *with following Cache configuration * > CacheConfiguration cg = null; > cg = new CacheConfiguration(cacheName, new QueryEntity(typeof(string), > type)); > cg.CacheMode = CacheMode.Replicated; > cg.EnableStatistics = true; > Apache.Ignite.Core.Cache.ICache<string, object> igniteModel = null; > igniteModel = IgniteInstance.GetOrCreateCache<string, object>(cg); > > *Step 3 - Cache data store/push in cache* > using (var cacheDataStreamer = IgniteInstance.GetDataStreamer<string, > object>("cacheName")) > { > object dbObj = class model data > cacheDataStreamer.AddData(modelCacheKey, dbObj); > } > > Kindly let me know if I need to add/set any more property for this. > > Thanks & Regards, > Charlin > > On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 22:01, Stephen Darlington < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I can see two likely possibilities: >> >> Your two server nodes are not forming a cluster. What do you see in the >> logs? You should see something like this: >> >> [18:42:46] Topology snapshot [ver=9, locNode=a4b47587, servers=2, >> clients=0, state=ACTIVE, CPUs=8, offheap=12.0GB, heap=4.0GB] >> >> Please confirm that it’s using the correct number of servers. >> >> Alternatively, your keys (or affinity keys) are not very random. What >> kind of field are you using as a key? You’ve not shared your cache >> configuration so this is difficult to validate. >> >> On 31 Mar 2021, at 17:04, Charlin S <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> Thanks for the reply. >> Based on our findings in logs, loads are going to one server. >> The server 10.212.120.66 is struggling to do its work: there are lots of >> "Possible too long JVM pause", "Query execution is too long" and "Long >> running query". >> On the other hand server 10.212.120.67 has a clean log without those >> messages. >> Yes, caches(165 cache models)are created by other windows applications >> and ASP.Net API for only reading data except few cache. >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> Charlin >> >> >> >> On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 20:00, Mikael <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> What is it that is not distributed well, is it cache data/memory load or >>> computations/cpu load ? >>> >>> There are no caches in the config so I assume this is created by the >>> application (if there are any), do you use any custom collocation ? >>> >>> Mikael >>> >>> Do you use any custom collocation of any kind >>> On 2021-03-31 15:52, Charlin S wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> Thanks for your reply. I have attached my configuration files here. >>> Below code has been used to start ignite. >>> >>> IgniteConfiguration igniteGridIg = new IgniteConfiguration(); >>> igniteGridIg.SpringConfigUrl = Path.Combine(igniteXmlfilePath); >>> Ignition.Start(igniteGridIg); >>> >>> Thanks & Regards, >>> Charlin >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 17:44, Stephen Darlington < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> What are you doing with Ignite? Are you sending compute tasks, cache >>>> operations, both? What’s your configuration? >>>> >>>> > On 31 Mar 2021, at 12:31, Charlin S <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > I'm running an ASP.Net application with ignite 2.9.1 and node setup >>>> as 2 server nodes and 11 client nodes. >>>> > We are seeing most of the load on one server only it's supposed to >>>> distribute load between two servers. >>>> > How can we distributed load be equally distributed on both servers? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Thanks & Regards, >>>> > Charlin >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
