Ignite fellows,

I remember some of us worked on the persistence defragmentation features.
Has it been merged?

@Valentin Kulichenko <valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> probably you know the
latest state.

-
Denis

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:59 AM Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello!
>
> You can probably drop the entire cache and then re-populate it via
> loadCache(), etc.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> ср, 23 июн. 2021 г. в 21:47, Ryan Trollip <ryanonthebe...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Thanks, Ilya, we may have to consider moving back to non-native storage
>> and caching more selectively as the performance degrades when there is a
>> lot of write/delete activity or tables with large amounts of rows. This is
>> with SQL with indexes and the use of query plans etc.
>>
>> Is there any easy way to rebuild the entire native database after hours?
>> e.g. with a batch run on the weeknds?
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 7:39 AM Ilya Kasnacheev <
>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I don't think there's anything ready to use, but "killing performance"
>>> from fragmentation is also not something reported too often.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>
>>>
>>> ср, 16 июн. 2021 г. в 04:39, Ryan Trollip <ryanonthebe...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> We see continual very large growth to data with ignite native. We have
>>>> a very chatty use case that's creating and deleting stuff often. The data
>>>> on disk just keeps growing at an explosive rate. So much so we ported this
>>>> to a DB to see the difference and the DB is much smaller. I was searching
>>>> to see if someone has the same issue. This is also killing performance.
>>>>
>>>> Founds this:
>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-47%3A+Native+persistence+defragmentation
>>>>
>>>> Apparently, there is no auto-rebalancing of pages? or cleanup of pages?
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone implemented a workaround to rebuild the cache and indexes
>>>> say on a weekly basis to get it to behave reasonably?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to