Hi, do you use multinode cluster? What do you mean by 'beans', is it
simple POJO or Spring bean?
I don't think that this is a good idea to store Spring beans in ignite
cache, because all data that goes to cache would be transformed to so
called BinaryObjects (However you can give it a try with on-heap caching
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/configuring-caches/on-heap-caching).
If we're talking about storing simple POJOs, I doubt that Ignite caches
will realize that you want to avoid duplication, so internally in cache
this single value object (that was shared in Map) will be transformed to
multiple BinaryObjects (that will have exactly same content). You can
try to use two caches C1, C2, where in C1 we actually store intermediate
key to unique value instance and in C2 we store key -> intermediate_key
mapping.
On 2022/10/14 06:31:55 Aravind J wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> We had a requirement to make multiple keys mapping to the same bean in
> Ignite cache , is it possible ? As SQL query performance is not matching
> with get by key , we are looking for possible alternatives . If we use
> , putAll(Map<? extends K,? extends V> map) with different keys and same
> bean , how will bean get persisted , will it be duplicated in memory ?
>
