Thank you, Sergi. That's exactly what we did wrong! I can see some issues with this solution when there is a large number of set elements. Also, as you mentioned that it's a common issue, I'm wondering if it would make sense for Ignite to support the "IN ?" syntax with an array or collection as argument (either by translating it to the correct syntax under the hood, or by providing a predefined SQL function for this case?). Apparently, we are not the only ones who expected the "IN ?" syntax to work.
-- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/SQL-IN-Operator-tp779p812.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
