we annotate the step methods with meta data we want to be able to display,
we then parse the code and output all the available steps.

We do this for the DSL also to help create the actual steps.

On 1 July 2012 13:03, Marius Brot <[email protected]> wrote:

> First of all: I like JBehave, but is it usable/operational for bigger
> projects?
>
> The big question for me is: How do you manage your documentation stuff
> about the available steps?
>
> I will illustrate our project structure to eplain why I'm asking.
> We have multiple components under test. Each component is probably an own
> application. For each component we created a JBehave project which
> implements its own Steps.
>
> A manager project will collect them all together and executes the stories.
>
> that means:
>  - Component A lib: Project with Component A related Steps
>  - Component B lib: Project with Component B related Steps
>  - ... and so on
>  - Test Manager: brings all component "libraries" together and contains
> the Stories for execution.
>
> -------
> How could we provide the story writers information about all available
> steps? Any ideas, best practices... ?
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/**manage_email<http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email>
>
>
>

Reply via email to