Hi Marius,
you make a good point and the idea of reusing scenarios (identified by a
name) is something we can indeed consider.
The one point I would make is that composite steps allow you to define
the grammar with variable parameters, that can be passed to the composed
steps, while reusing the entire textual scenarios (but not sub-parts
thereof), would be with the fixed parameters it has been defined with.
Can you propose some example use cases on which we can start formulating
some ideas?
Cheers
On 05/07/2012 20:36, Marius Brot wrote:
Due to prevent duplication of step sequences by modularizing complex
stories I want to define parts of them textual as
scenarios/stories(/modules) which I can call from within the complex
story by there name.
Composite Steps cover my need currently at the best. But I dislike the
limitation that they must be defined by code. In my opinion composite
steps are partial scenarios and should be part of the textual
described artifacts.
The GivenStories feature has a limited use for this, since it's just
for pre-requisites of stories or scenarios and it locates its
executable by its path.
Are there any schedules related with the modularization of stories?
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
