In your case, you could also do a check in the implementation of the
step for the value of the parameter and throw an exception when the
value entered corresponds to elements not yet available.
But, instead of a pending step, you'd have a failed one (because of the
lack of elements). The advantage is that the definition of the step is
defined and remains the same, without needing to change in the textual
stories.
Cheers
On 10/08/2012 15:11, mary walshe wrote:
Thanks for the replies,
I have multiple stories checking the text on a list of element.
I am passing in the text to check though an excel sheet. For each
story there is a separate worksheet in my excel file.
In this case I have added a story which I would like the step to be
pending in as the elements are not yet available to check.
Everything is identical across the steps bar the parameter being
passed in. I would like the step in this one story to be pending for
statistical reasons.
I think I will change the language of the step for this scenario until
the new elements are available.
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
