Mauro,
I've been hearing of really great improvement for 4.0 for a while. Do you have 
a feature list for 4.0? Also do you have an ETA of a non Beta release?

Thanks,
Enrique


-----Original Message-----
From: Mauro Talevi [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 8:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [jbehave-user] Differentiating between test failures and test 
errors

I would not really go down that route.

In 4.x StoryRunner will be completely replaced by a different tree-based 
execution engine called PerformableTree.    The idea is to create a tree 
of performable objects that can contain runtime results which can then be 
rendered in a template, thereby rendering the story reporter obsolete.

I'd prefer you gave the latest 4.0-beta-4 a whirl (I've released it today and 
it should be synched soon to Maven Central).

You could start by creating a new JIRA issue outlining your use case and we 
take it from there.

On 19/01/2014 12:05, Stephen de Vries wrote:
> Thank Mauro,
>
> Ideally, I'd like to see the error in the xml and html files, e.g.  <step 
> outcome="error"> , so it sounds like I'd have to re-implement StoryRunner and 
> create a custom StoryReporter to achieve this?  Is there an easier way?
>
>
>
>    
> On 19 Jan 2014, at 11:21, Mauro Talevi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> JBehave supports the definition of a custom and configurable 
>> FailureStrategy, which defaults to RethrowingFailure.
>>
>> You can provide your own implementation which can check if the Throwable is 
>> an UnexpectedContentException or not and decide how to handle it, e.g. log a 
>> message and swallow the exception.
>>
>> Be aware though that if you do rethrow the exception, it'll be treated by 
>> the JBehave story execution as a failure.   So there is no specific 
>> mechanism to distinguish the failures thereafter.
>>
>> On 19/01/2014 09:54, Stephen de Vries wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a mechanism in JBehave to differentiate between a scenario failure 
>>> and a scenario error?  Basically, when a scenario fails I'd like to know 
>>> whether it's a problem with my test, or a problem with the application 
>>> under test.
>>>
>>> I'm using JBehave for security tests, so a scenario failure indicates a 
>>> security vulnerability; but I have error checking logic in the test itself 
>>> which just ensures that the test is behaving properly, so if there's an 
>>> error in the test then I don't want the test to "fail" but rather to throw 
>>> some kind of distinguishable error condition, like in the following 
>>> contrived example:
>>>
>>> @Then("bob must not see alice's private data") public void 
>>> checkAccessControl() {
>>>     loginAsBob();
>>>     driver.get(bobsPage);
>>>          if (notOnBobsPage()) throw UnexpectedContentException("Can't 
>>> access bob's page even though bob is logged in"); //Test error
>>>                   driver.get(alicesPage);
>>>          assertThat("bob can see alices data", canViewAlicesData(), 
>>> is(true));  //Application error and security vulnerability }
>>>          In the case above, I'd like the scenario outcome to be different 
>>> if assertion fails vs if the UnexpectedContentException is thrown.   If 
>>> there's no native way to do this in JBehave, do you have any ideas on the 
>>> easiest way to achieve this?
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> - To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>
>>>      http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>      http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to