Andrew: You are now very clear.
/BK On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Andrew Phillips <[email protected]> wrote: > I was just asking the question if the jcloud api for vCloud is thead-safe, >> given that the VMware's own Java SDK binding for vCloud is not. >> (No Java SDK binding for vCloud involved here :) in the pom) >> > > Sorry, I didn't formulate my answer clearly enough. I obviously don't know > if the vCloud API *itself* is inherently not thread-safe - in that case, I > don't think jclouds is doing anything magical to fix that. > > But if the lack of thread safety is in the *Java SDK binding* (by which > I'm presuming we're referring to VMware's own Java libraries to talk to the > vCloud API), then I don't think jclouds should be affected since it doesn't > use VMware's Java libraries in its implementation. > > Does that make more sense? Or am I misunderstanding the question here? > > ap >
