bump

(Y)

> On Mar 22, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Yaron Rosenbaum <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> More info:
> 
> I tried creating the nodes without specifying ssh login credentials (so that 
> they will be created automatically), to eliminate a potential problem with 
> the keys I specify. The problem remains.
> 
> I’m pretty much convinced by now, that this is a timeout issue: Because I 
> specify a cloud-init that takes a while to execute (more than 60000 msec), 
> ssh daemon / ssh keys are not installed by the time the sshj jcloouds module 
> tries to connect.
> 
> There should be some retry / exponential backoff mechanism around the code 
> that tries to configure new nodes via ssh. As the email below explains, I 
> tried setting some overrides suggested by someone in the IRC channel, but 
> they seem to do nothing in this case.
> 
> Any help would be appreciated!!
> 
> 
> (Y)
> 
>> On Mar 20, 2015, at 11:51 AM, Yaron Rosenbaum <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> I fail to create nodes properly, getting the following error:
>> 
>> 11:42:32.780 [user thread 3] ERROR jclouds.ssh - << 
>> (core:rsa[ssh-agent]@1….2) error acquiring {hostAndPort=1…2:22, 
>> loginUser=core, ssh=null, connectTimeout=60000, sessionTimeout=60000} (not 
>> retryable): Exhausted available authentication methods
>> net.schmizz.sshj.userauth.UserAuthException: Exhausted available 
>> authentication methods
>> 
>> I’ve set the following overrides:
>>              
>> overrides.setProperty(ComputeServiceProperties.POLL_INITIAL_PERIOD, 
>> TWENTY_SECONDS);
>>              overrides.setProperty(ComputeServiceProperties.POLL_MAX_PERIOD, 
>> TWENTY_SECONDS);
>>              // 18 retries of 15 seconds --> 4.5 min
>>              overrides.setProperty(Constants.PROPERTY_MAX_RETRIES, "6"); 
>>              overrides.setProperty(Constants.PROPERTY_RETRY_DELAY_START, 
>> "15");
>> 
>> Note the ’(not retryable)’ and ssh=null, they look suspicious but I don’t 
>> know what they mean.
>> 
>> PS Nodes are created nonetheless.
>> If a node fails to create ‘properly’ - maybe there should be some option to 
>> force remove it or something ?
>> 
>> (Y)
>> 
> 

Reply via email to