Given the silence in this thread, I'd say go ahead and remove it.
On 3 July 2017 at 23:47, Andrew Gaul <g...@apache.org> wrote: > Does anyone use the EMC Atmos provider? As I understand it, EMC has not > developed this in some years, preferring the S3 and Swift protocols for > its products. Atmos is a bit of an odd bird, having more of a > filesystem interface and semantics than an object store and lacking > features like multi-part upload and server-side filtering. The recent > disappearance of Atmos Online leaves me unable to test the provider for > the jclouds 2.0.2 release. I would like to remove the Atmos provider if > no one is using it. > > -- > Andrew Gaul > http://gaul.org/
