Reported https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773
-- Bruno Antunes Software Engineer On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Philippe Mouawad < [email protected]> wrote: > Can you create a Bugzilla and attach your test case ? > > Thanks > Regards > Philippe > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Bruno Antunes > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Just one correction. Test period was 60 seconds (one minute) > > > > regards, > > -- > > Bruno Antunes > > Software Engineer > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Bruno Antunes > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > I have performed a very simple test, using JMS Publisher sampler on > > > JMeter, and a "jms.r11.Sender" test case on Harness , with similar > test > > > conditions: > > > * No ramp-up, only one thread > > > * same message size (1000 bytes) > > > * same destination queue > > > * same duration test period (60 minutes) > > > * running as fast as possible (no delay between samples) > > > > > > From this tests, I observe that Harness generates almost 90% more > > messages > > > than JMeter. As such we achieve greater throughput with one thread in a > > one > > > minute test using Harness > > > > > > In order to get same throughput for jmeter, we must configure more > > threads. > > > > > > Tested with JMeter 2.6, and IBM Performance Harness for Java Message > > > Service 1.2 ( > > > > > > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/groups/service/html/communityview?communityUuid=1c020fe8-4efb-4d70-afb7-0f561120c2aa > > > ) > > > > > > Any ideas of why JMeter generates much less load? I have even run > jmeter > > > with no gui, and saves results in CSV format. > > > > > > -- > > > Bruno Antunes > > > Software Engineer > > > > > > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. >
