Okay. This is really helpful for me. Really appreciate your help. Thanks a lot !! I will try to use Aggregate Graph.
A quick question what should be the Ramp-Up period for 300 threads ideally to get realistic results? Thanks, -Amit On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Adrian Speteanu <[email protected]>wrote: > I've told you, ignore the thread name for now. It would be easier to > understand. The request named "Home" took 20s. Its as simple as that and it > probably is too much, your app works either to slow on the test environment > or you are making too much load. And yes, its the request that the 220th > user made. > > Use the Aggregate Graph and check out the average result and 90% line for > all Home page requests, its irrelevant to take request by request, they all > take about the same time if you check the other requests so look the > aggregation of all samplers. > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Amit Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Adrian, > > > > Thank you for your valuable time and sorry for your inconvenience. Let me > > paste some rows of the result table. > > > > Sampele # Start Time Thread Name Lable Sample > > Time(ms) Status Bytes > > 17 19:26.6 > > Thread Group 1-8 > > Home 21684 > > Success 41629 18 19:26.6 > > Thread Group 1-220 > > Home 22095 > > Success 41629 19 19:27.7 > > Thread Group 1-300 > > Home 21037 > > Warning 1473 > > And I have to explain these results to my senior that's why I am asking > > these questions. These were the first few questions from him to me. > > Lets take an example *sampler #18*, here you see *thread Name=Thread > Group > > 1-220 *and *Sample Time(ms)=22095ms*. So my question is, is this *sample > > time *for *220th user *or *220 users collectively*? > > > > And what is mean by *Status=Success* and *Status=Warning? > > > > * > > Thanks, > > -Amit > > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Adrian Speteanu <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > I'm not sure what are you trying to accomplish and I've rarely used the > > > results table. I doubt I can help. > > > > > > You identify a request usually by its label. I would suggest ignoring > > > thread name for a while. Then look at sample time (how much it took for > > the > > > server to respond), status ok/not ok. This is all you need to know. How > > you > > > pasted the results, they don't make sense to me, it should be first > > thread > > > name, then sample time (this is the default order of the columns). > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Amit Kumar <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Adrian, > > > > > > > > Thanks again, but I still not getting. I got following result in > table. > > > > > > > > Thread Name Sample Time > > > > Thread Group 1-287 > > > > 47902 Thread Group 1-165 > > > > 49269 Thread Group 1-119 > > > > 49917 > > > > And my question is- For Thread Name- '1-287' there is Sample > Time=47902 > > > ms. > > > > So, is this Sample Time for '287th' user or '1 to 287' users > > > collectively? > > > > Please add some focus, I am too confused. > > > > Thanks in advance !! > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Amit > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Adrian Speteanu < > [email protected] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Amit Kumar <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you Adrian for reply. I will keep your suggestion in mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > One more thing, does JMeter creates these groups i.e. 1-17, 1-9, > > > 1-299 > > > > > > automatically ? Could you please elaborate this working, please? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, how would you expect them to be created? Its a very > simplistic > > > > > representation and, thus, efficient -> now you can use the results > > > table > > > > to > > > > > understand that thread #299 of the 1st thread group made request X > > and > > > it > > > > > had that exact result (this is very useful when debugging a test's > > > > > behaviour, logging an exception encountered). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Amit > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Adrian Speteanu < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First of all don't use Results Tree or Table during tests with > > more > > > > > than > > > > > > a > > > > > > > few virtual-users. > > > > > > > 1. first number represents thread group # (if you have to > groups > > > > you'll > > > > > > see > > > > > > > 2-xxx), second number represents the number of the thread in > that > > > > > group. > > > > > > > 2. for response times use the aggregate graph, instead, > > especially > > > > > during > > > > > > > load tests. Some details are in the help of the GUI element. In > > > your > > > > > case > > > > > > > it shows the exact response time in miliseconds. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Amit Kumar < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is someone over here to help me in my query? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Amit Kumar < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am new to JMeter. I ran simple test load test with 300 > > > users. I > > > > > > used > > > > > > > > > table view for report. I have confusion about THREAD NAME > > field > > > > and > > > > > > > > SAMPLE > > > > > > > > > TIME(ms) columns the following columns. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. In Thread Name column, there are entries like 1-17, 1-9, > > > > 1-299. > > > > > So > > > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > does this mean? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thread Name Thread Group 1-17 Thread Group 1-9 Thread > > Group > > > > > 1-34 > > > > > > > > > 1. What is sample time? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sample Time(ms) 6507 6560 9896 > > > > > > > > > Looking forward for your prompt reply. Actually, It's on > > urgent > > > > > > basic. > > > > > > > > > Therefore, I need your help !! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > > > > > > Amit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > > > > > > Amit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > > > > > Amit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > > > Amit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > Amit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks and Regards, > > Amit > > > -- Thanks and Regards, Amit
