well, loosly speaking, the words aren't exactly synonims and the way they are usually used in java, jmeter relies on the differences between the terms. I don't understand why this stands in your way.
i agree with your definition of simultaneous, regarding jmeter's threads. THEN, synchronization will ensure that the configured number of threads will do ONE specific action simultaneously, instead of ANY action. This is actually what you want with this feature. Threads get de-synchronized because of server response times, ramp up period and timers used in jmter's script - which is good in terms of realism of test. If you actually require that all threads (or some of them) start specific portions of a test together (to overload that functionality), then you'll need to re-synchronize them -> i.e. use this sync timer. in my understanding, they are not the same thing. as for "will have active sessions" - i can't tell you that; it will, if you're loging in correctly with each single thread... On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:45 AM, niraj <[email protected]> wrote: > synchronized and concurrency are same. Users will have active sessions and > doing exact same thing at a given point of time. > > Simultaneous: Users have active sessions, but performing different actions > at given point of time. > > If my understanding is wrong then please do correct me. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Generate-Concurrent-user-load-tp5646401p5653351.html > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
