On 12 June 2012 22:57, Kirk Pepperdine <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2012-06-13, at 12:54 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 12 June 2012 22:06, Kirk Pepperdine <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I figured thread pooling would be revolutionary so I wasn't suggesting >>> that. I would be very useful just delay the creation of a thread until it >>> was asked for. >> >> Not sure I understand how it would help to delay the thread creation, >> except perhaps for the case where the first threads have finished >> processing by the time the last threads start running samples. > > Bingo!!! ;-)
So what percentage of use cases need to follow this model? Most of the JMeter testing I have done was long running tests where all threads were active for most of the run. > Kirk > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
