Thank you but I am still confused. So you mean constant time also does the
same job like ramp-up period. Lets say I have following configuration

Number of threads : 250
Ramp up period : 450
Loop : 3

>From what I have understood about rampup. It takes 450 seconds to complete
250 threads. So the delay between thread 1 and thread 2 is 450/250 seconds.

So if I also add constant timer to this configuration lets say (450/250)
seconds. I don't get why do we need constant timer when ramp up is doing
the same thing.
On Aug 16, 2013 4:51 AM, "Flavio Cysne" <[email protected]> wrote:

> No. The Constant Timer is the delay between the start of one thread to the
> start of the next thread. No relation among threads execution time at all.
> So if thread 1 starts and take 1 second to complete, and Constant Timer has
> 300ms delay, then the second thread will start before 1st thread ends.
>
> Ramp-up also put this delay in your threads, the same way constant timer
> will do. If you want to leverage concurrency remove the timer.
>
>
> 2013/8/15 umesh prajapati <[email protected]>
>
> > If I put the timer, than it means 2nd request has to wait until the first
> > request is complete. This means if first request is taking time to
> process
> > the request than 2nd request will not start until the first request is
> > completed.  Which means there won't be a load but I am doing a load test.
> > On Aug 14, 2013 12:50 PM, "Flavio Cysne" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > only in the first http sampler
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/8/14 umesh prajapati <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > > one quick question do i add the timer on thread group or the http
> > reques
> > > > sampler
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:25 AM, umesh prajapati <
> [email protected]
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > @ flavio Thanks ...will try it out and let you know the result.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Flavio Cysne <
> [email protected]
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I think you misunderstood me.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> "I know in my application, one user is not allowed to login
> multiple
> > > > >> times until
> > > > >> the session thats logged in is logged out."
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Loop 2 threads can't start until all Loop 1 threads are over.
> > > > >> Synchronizing
> > > > >> Timer with "Number of simulated users" equal to the number of
> > threads
> > > > will
> > > > >> ensure this.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> "@Flavio I dont need to start all my thread at once,..."
> > > > >>
> > > > >> That's why I suggest you to use a Constant timer with an
> expression.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> "...But I would like to test the real scenario, where 2000 users
> > login
> > > > in
> > > > >> 2
> > > > >> hrs. So, basically 1 min 33 users."
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Modify that 300 in Constant Timer expression for the value
> > equivalent
> > > to
> > > > >> time gap for 33 users within 1 minute. (60000ms / 33 users =
> > > > ~1818ms/user)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to