I havent tried that out yet but will let you know once I do.

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Deepak Shetty <[email protected]> wrote:

> does that mean it fixed the problem for you as well?
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:20 AM, umesh prajapati <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > thank you
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Deepak Shetty <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > > Atleast for me moving back to JDK1.6 from JDK1.7 fixed it - at that
> time
> > > however there were plenty of google hits for SSLPeerUnverifiedException
> > > (not necessarily related to JMeter , but related to the JDK itself)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Karl St-Jacques <
> [email protected]
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > I've been using jmeter for a short while, doing load test with it.
> I've
> > > ran
> > > > a scenario multiple time already with success. But this morning I
> got a
> > > > weird issue. All my calls to the servers returned the following
> error :
> > > >
> > > > Non HTTP response code: javax.net.ssl.SSLPeerUnverifiedException,Non
> > HTTP
> > > > response message: peer not authenticated
> > > >
> > > > As far as I know, the infrastructure didn't change on our side nor
> does
> > > the
> > > > scenario.
> > > >
> > > > I also use a script to spawn instances with amazon to load test
> > remotely,
> > > > available at the following address :
> > > > www.http503.com/2012/run-jmeter-on-amazon-ec2-cloud/
> > > >
> > > > Sadly I didn't found anyone with this particular issue on google nor
> > the
> > > > archive of this mailing list.
> > > >
> > > > I've done modification to the load tests server, using a different
> AMI
> > > > version, a different Java version, changing the ssl parameter in the
> > > > jmeter.properties file, no success at all. I always get this error.
> > > >
> > > > Am I missing something? Somebody got a similar error in the past?
> > > >
> > > > I'm also not sure what kind of information I should provide.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Karl
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to