AFAIK BeanShell does not support the new-style for loops

Try the code in command-line BeanShell

On 7 September 2015 at 11:08, SanderW <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using a BeanShell PostProcessor for parsing a JSON response.
> For that I'm using Ralf Sternberg’s slim JSON parser for Java
> (http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2013/04/18/minimal-json-parser-for-java/)
>
> When using a for-loop I get an error "Can't iterate over type: class
> com.eclipsesource.json.JsonArray".
> Ralf asks me for a stacktrace, so I've added a try-catch, but I don't seem
> to get the stacktrace anywhere.
>
> How do I get a stacktrace for this error?
>
> /try {
>         for (JsonValue member : members) log.info("firstName: " + firstName);
> }
> catch (Throwable ex) {
>     log.error("Failed to do this or that", ex);
> }/
>
> jmeter.log:
> 2015/09/07 12:07:50 ERROR - jmeter.util.BeanShellInterpreter: Error invoking
> bsh method: eval        Sourced file: inline evaluation of: ``import
> com.eclipsesource.json.*;  String jsonString = prev.getResponseDataAsStri .
> . . '' : Can't iterate over type: class com.eclipsesource.json.JsonArray
> 2015/09/07 12:07:50 WARN  - jmeter.protocol.java.sampler.BeanShellSampler:
> org.apache.jorphan.util.JMeterException: Error invoking bsh method: eval
> Sourced file: inline evaluation of: ``import com.eclipsesource.json.*;
> String jsonString = prev.getResponseDataAsStri . . . '' : Can't iterate over
> type: class com.eclipsesource.json.JsonArray
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Getting-stacktrace-for-org-apache-jorphan-util-JMeterException-tp5723175.html
> Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to