Hi Deepak, Do you mean that adding timers will not increase the response time?
Regards. On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Deepak Shetty <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > assuming you are referring to the response time of each sampler (and not > throughput) - I do not see the behavior you are seeing > Jmeter does not include the delay in the sampler times . However Throughput > for e.g. in say Summary Report would include the delay in its calculation- > so youll need to specify what and how you are measuring the time > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Onl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Should jmeter include timer delays in the results? > > My tests has a Uniform Random Timer at the thread-level, such that: > > > > THREAD_ONE > > UNIFORM RANDOM TIMER (max 100ms) > > HTTP SAMPLE 1 > > HTTP SAMPLE 2 > > HTTP SAMPLE 3 > > HTTP SAMPLE 4 > > HTTP SAMPLE 5 > > HTTP SAMPLE 6 > > HTTP SAMPLE 7 > > HTTP SAMPLE 8 > > HTTP SAMPLE 9 ... > > (hundreds of samplers) > > > > Thread count is 100, rampup is 100. > > > > > > WITHOUT TIMER DELAY > > ==================== > > > > 3.696, 1.709, 2.447 (recycle tomcat) > > 3.801, 1.670, 2.488 (recycle tomcat) > > > > WITH TIMER DELAY > > ================ > > 3.678, 2.945, 5.305 (recycle tomcat) > > 3.425, 2.974, 5.709 > > > > (time is in seconds) > > > > It was my understanding that timers are not included in the results. But > > consistently, > > my tests with the timers are nearly double the time than those without > > after the first run. > > > > What is going on here? > > Why is the time for the 2nd and 3rd iteration double? > > Is there a way to exclude timer delays from the results? > > Is there a flaw in my process? > > > > Thanks > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > -- Regards, Pravesh prajapati. Mob:-9702600170
