Well, you definitely do want to have these as separate requests. Knowing
that possibly 2 out of every 3 attempts to login fail to return a non-200
response code is valuable data!

I would argue that a request that has timed out twice and succeeds on the
third try is not a single successful login.



On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Muhammad Nasir <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes My use case is as follows:
>
> I am testing a http API on load and client which is using this API has 30
> sec request timeout implemented (This means on load some of the request may
> result in request timeout error). To avoid permanent failures we have
> implemented 2 retries / request on client side before marking it as failed
> and I am trying to implement the same retry mechanism in JMeter load test
> as well.
>
> Now having said that, I have already implemented the retry mechanism using
> while loop as:
> *${__jexl3(("${Login_Code}" != "200") && ("${Login_Counter}" <= "1"))}*
>
> but the problem with this code is that it reports all retries as separate
> requests on Report which gives me false reporting.
>
> Suppose if any request pass in 2nd retry than JMeter is reporting it as 2
> requests failed and 1 Passed, which means it has skewed my results and I am
> unable to identify the exact failure/success rate.
>
> Any help or code samples to achieve this will be highly appreciated.
>
>
>
> *Muhammad Nasir*
> Lead Quality Assurance Engineer
> *folio3* Pvt. Ltd.
> www.folio3.com
> Cell: +92 332 257 9082
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Andrew Burton <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I would expect that each call to sample() in your line:
> >
> > SampleResult result = ctx.getCurrentSampler().sample(null);
> >
> > would result in a new request being logged.
> >
> > If you don't want to use a Transaction Controller as suggested, the only
> > way to "work around" this would be to write your own custom sampler that
> > allows for retrying based on a text response from the server.
> >
> > Is there any more context for your question, e.g. why you might need to
> > handle multiple failures before getting the response you want?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Muhammad Nasir <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Antonio but I am not looking for this solution.
> > >
> > > *Muhammad Nasir*
> > > Lead Quality Assurance Engineer
> > > *folio3* Pvt. Ltd.
> > > www.folio3.com
> > > Cell: +92 332 257 9082
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Use a Transaction Controller :
> > > > http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/component_
> > > reference.html#Transaction_
> > > > Controller
> > > >
> > > > Antonio
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2017-11-09 18:02 GMT+01:00 Muhammad Nasir <[email protected]>:
> > > >
> > > > > Anyone to help on this?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Nasir
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 09-Nov-2017, at 10:59 AM, Muhammad Nasir <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am having false reporting due to number of retries. I have
> > > > implemented
> > > > > a retry mechanism as
> > > > > > " ${__jexl3(("${Login_Code}" != "200") && ("${Login_Counter}" <=
> > > > "2"))} "
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Let's say I am executing a request which retries for 2 times and
> > then
> > > > > Failed is actually reported as 3 independent requests on
> > > > Aggregate/Results
> > > > > Tree Reports.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there a way to report this as single failure because this is
> > > > > ultimately a single request with 2 retries?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Note: I tried following solution and its not working either
> > > > > > import org.apache.jmeter.samplers.SampleResult;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if (new String(ResponseData).equals("message")) {
> > > > > >     SampleResult result = ctx.getCurrentSampler().sample(null);
> > > > > >     if (result.getResponseDataAsString().equals("message")) {
> > > > > >         Failure = true;
> > > > > >     } else {
> > > > > >         SampleResult.setSuccessful(true);
> > > > > >     }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Nasir
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to