Hello Mateus, Your question may be better-answered in the JMeter Plugins group over at Google Groups. https://groups.google.com/g/jmeter-plugins
Maybe you have too many samples in too-tiny a window that is causing the plugin to miss a few points? I can't say for sure. I don't suppose using the smallest granularity possible would result in *all* points being included in the graph. I would, however, trust JMeter results file (csv/jtl) over the graph. And--given that you have a very small number of samples--you do have the option of plotting those using Excel. SK On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 9:49 PM Mateus Guilherme < mateusguilhermedasi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I have a question about the latency graph over time generated with the > "Graphs Generator" plugin. The plugin "View Result Tree" generated the > report "reports.csv" (or "report.xlsx" already separated by columns). It is > possible to see the 100 HTTP requests generated by the 100 threads that I > configured in the "Thread Group". In this report it is possible to observe > that there are requests with latency values of 331ms, 334ms, 339ms 341ms, > 342ms, but in the chart "LatenciesOverTime.png" these values do not appear. > > To generate the graph I'm using the value of 1ms in the field "Granulation > time for samples" of the plugin "Graphs Generator". If we analyze the file > "LatenciesOverTime.csv" it is possible to see that the highest latency > value it contains is 272ms. Why don't the higher latencies, which appear in > the reports.csv file (334ms, 339ms, 341ms, 342ms... ) appear in the graph? > > thanks > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org
