Thanks Dmitri!

You got me on the right track. Found this 
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/biztalk/technical-guides/settings-that-can-be-modified-to-improve-network-performance
 and especially decreasing TcpTimedWaitDelay seemed to have a significant and 
good effect.
My problem was not the number of threads as much as the port recycle time I 
believe.

BR
/Krister

Från: Dmitri Tikhanski <glin...@live.com>
Skickat: den 12 december 2022 08:34
Till: JMeter Users List <user@jmeter.apache.org>; Krister Nilsson 
<krister.nils...@pensionsmyndigheten.se>
Ämne: Re: Address already in use with Concurrency Thread Group

Krister Nilsson wrote:

Hi!



Not sure if this group also answers questions about plugins, but it's worth a 
try.



I am using the Concurrency Thread Group (v 2.10 of the downloaded zip) and even 
when I configure it to increase in steps of two(2) threads I get the stack 
trace below for a bunch of requests. It happens already when running with 10 
threads and 1200 tpm and it seems very much like it starts a few seconds BEFORE 
the plugin is about to increase the number of threads with (in this case) two 
more threads. Anyone who has seen the same problem and has a solution?



java.net.BindException: Address already in use: connect

          at java.net.DualStackPlainSocketImpl.connect0(Native Method)

          at 
java.net.DualStackPlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(DualStackPlainSocketImpl.java:79)

          at 
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:350)

          at 
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:206)

          at 
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:188)

          at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(PlainSocketImpl.java:172)

          at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:392)

          at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:607)

          at 
org.apache.http.conn.ssl.SSLConnectionSocketFactory.connectSocket(SSLConnectionSocketFactory.java:368)

          at 
org.apache.jmeter.protocol.http.sampler.hc.LazyLayeredConnectionSocketFactory.connectSocket(LazyLayeredConnectionSocketFactory.java:92)

          at 
org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultHttpClientConnectionOperator.connect(DefaultHttpClientConnectionOperator.java:142)

          at 
org.apache.jmeter.protocol.http.sampler.HTTPHC4Impl$JMeterDefaultHttpClientConnectionOperator.connect(HTTPHC4Impl.java:326)

          at 
org.apache.http.impl.conn.PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager.connect(PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager.java:374)

          at 
org.apache.http.impl.execchain.MainClientExec.establishRoute(MainClientExec.java:393)

          at 
org.apache.http.impl.execchain.MainClientExec.execute(MainClientExec.java:236)

          at 
org.apache.http.impl.execchain.ProtocolExec.execute(ProtocolExec.java:186)

          at org.apache.http.impl.execchain.RetryExec.execute(RetryExec.java:89)

          at 
org.apache.http.impl.execchain.RedirectExec.execute(RedirectExec.java:110)

          at 
org.apache.http.impl.client.InternalHttpClient.doExecute(InternalHttpClient.java:185)

          at 
org.apache.http.impl.client.CloseableHttpClient.execute(CloseableHttpClient.java:83)

          at 
org.apache.jmeter.protocol.http.sampler.HTTPHC4Impl.executeRequest(HTTPHC4Impl.java:850)

          at 
org.apache.jmeter.protocol.http.sampler.HTTPHC4Impl.sample(HTTPHC4Impl.java:561)

          at 
org.apache.jmeter.protocol.http.sampler.HTTPSamplerProxy.sample(HTTPSamplerProxy.java:67)

          at 
org.apache.jmeter.protocol.http.sampler.HTTPSamplerBase.sample(HTTPSamplerBase.java:1282)

          at 
org.apache.jmeter.protocol.http.sampler.HTTPSamplerBase.sample(HTTPSamplerBase.java:1271)

          at 
org.apache.jmeter.threads.JMeterThread.doSampling(JMeterThread.java:627)

          at 
org.apache.jmeter.threads.JMeterThread.executeSamplePackage(JMeterThread.java:551)

          at 
org.apache.jmeter.threads.JMeterThread.processSampler(JMeterThread.java:490)

          at org.apache.jmeter.threads.JMeterThread.run(JMeterThread.java:257)

          at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:750)



With the normal vanilla Jmeter Thread Group the same does NOT occur even for 20 
threads.



Med vänlig hälsning

Krister Nilsson

____________________________________________________________



Krister Nilsson / översteprest, prestandatest



IT Fond konto och teknisk plattform

Telefon direkt 010-454 21 97, mobil 072-210 21 97

krister.nils...@pensionsmyndigheten.se<mailto:krister.nils...@pensionsmyndigheten.se><mailto:krister.nils...@pensionsmyndigheten.se><mailto:krister.nils...@pensionsmyndigheten.se>



Pensionsmyndigheten,

Telefon vxl 0771-771 771, fax 08-658 13 00, 
www.pensionsmyndigheten.se<http://www.pensionsmyndigheten.se><http://www.pensionsmyndigheten.se/><http://www.pensionsmyndigheten.se/>





P Överväg miljöpåverkan innan du skriver ut detta e-brev.




Indeed questions about plugins should go to JMeter Plugins Support 
Forum<https://groups.google.com/g/jmeter-plugins> however I don't think it's 
connected with Concurrency Thread Group per se, try inspecting both test run 
results files using i.e. Active Threads Over 
Time<https://jmeter-plugins.org/wiki/ActiveThreadsOverTime/> and/or b listeners 
(can be installed using JMeter Plugins 
Manager<https://www.blazemeter.com/blog/jmeter-plugins-manager>), I'm pretty 
much sure that the load pattern would be different.

The error means that you've run out of outbound ports so:

  1.  You either need to get another machine and go for Distributed 
Testing<https://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/jmeter_distributed_testing_step_by_step.html>
  2.  Or amend your operating system configuration in order to increase the 
maximum number of outbound TCP ports and/or decrease port recycle time as most 
probably you're trying to reuse the port which hasn't been returned to the pool 
yet like it's described in Solved “java.net.BindException: Address already in 
use: connect” 
issue<https://www.baselogic.com/2011/11/23/solved-java-net-bindexception-address-use-connect-issue-windows/>
 on Windows article

Reply via email to