+1 for an enterprise CXF feature.

This way it is also much easier to connect two Karaf instances via
DOSGi (CXF) :)



2011/2/11  <[email protected]>:
> Hi Manuel,
>
> The easiest way is indeed to use CXF.
> Currently, CXF feature is part of ServiceMix4 but it could make sense to add 
> it in the Karaf Enterprise features.
>
> Let see the feeling of the team ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manuel Bernhardt <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:03:39
> To: <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Subject: Deploying a WebService on Karaf
>
> Hi all,
>
> a colleague of mine is looking at a way to deploy a legacy webservice
> of which he can't touch the code on Karaf.
>
> I looked around and found an old thread with a post from Guillaume:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg05523.html
>
> which points to an example using ServiceMix.
>
>
> Before digging further I'd like to ask a few questions here:
>
> 1) (you never know) is there maybe an example of this (i.e. exposing a
> webservice with cxf on karaf) somewhere? I haven't found one so far.
>
> 2) if there is no example, would the following work:
>   - deploy the cxf bundles on Karaf (maybe there's a feature
> descriptor for this somewhere?)
>   - declare the WS endpoint in the blueprint configuration - that is I
> have only found instances of this being done in the old spring-dm
> descriptor, but I suppose using the CXF namespace in blueprint should
> somehow do the trick?
>
> One more thing: after more googling specifically for the history of
> Karaf I found a helpful blog entry
> (http://icodebythesea.blogspot.com/2011/01/brief-history-of-apache-karaf.html)
> which explains the link ServiceMix -> Karaf. That is, the ServiceMix
> Kernel website says nothing about it, and a lot of things (forum
> entries, ML archives, ...) still point to it which makes it all very
> confusing.
> Would it be possible to place a big red bar (or whatever else warning
> sign) on the ServiceMix Kernel page redirecting to Karaf?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Manuel
>

Reply via email to