I'd have to take a look at the main for karaf if we do some
specialties to "disable" it :-)

regards, Achim

2011/8/16 Jürgen Kindler <[email protected]>:
> Well, for standalone Java processes, I it works.
> I also start JVMs directly and they react on sigterm.
> Surprising why it would not with Karaf.
>
> --
> Jürgen Kindler
>
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]>
> Antworten an: Karaf User <[email protected]>
> Datum: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:01:50 +0200
> An: Karaf User <[email protected]>
> Betreff: Re: Killing Karaf instance using sigterm (-15)
>
>>I'm not sure if it's a bug or a feature :-)
>>But I'd rather use the service wrapper for such things cause the
>>service wrapper also reacts on the Sigterm signal.
>>The std. shell scripts depend on java and how it handles it :-)
>>
>>Regards, Achim
>>
>>2011/8/16 JÃ1Ž4rgen Kindler <[email protected]>:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Trying to gracefully terminate a Karaf instance I had started on a
>>>remote
>>> system using the STAF process service, but Karaf does not react at all.
>>> The same is true for a Karaf I start locally on a terminal and try to
>>> terminate from another terminal window using kill ­15 <pid>.
>>> My observation is that it does not matter whether I started Karaf with
>>> ./bin/karaf or ./bin/start ­ in any case the process does not react on
>>>the
>>> sigterm signal.
>>> Could this be a bug?
>>> Cheers
>>>   Jürgen
>>> --
>>> Jürgen Kindler
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>--
>>*Achim Nierbeck*
>>
>>
>>Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>Committer & Project Lead
>>blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>
>



-- 
--
*Achim Nierbeck*


Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer & Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Reply via email to