How have you been installing the configured set of bundles on the karaf machines?
As Achim said fileinstall will keep all the bundles there but I think it copies the bundles rather than using reference: urls so (if I'm right) it will be using more disk space. There might be other solutions.... keep talking :-) thanks david jencks On Apr 12, 2012, at 2:26 PM, bobshort wrote: > Thanks for the suggestions. > > I'm not sure if the local repo thing will work for us or not. Our system is > end-user configurable. Basically we have a core set of bundles and then > customers can install various bundles to integrate with a wide variety of > end hardware (zigbee, modbus, z-wave, etc.). We've also got customer > specific modules to integrate with proprietary systems. Ultimately we don't > know what modules are going to be installed when the system ships, so we > can't really add them to the local repo and startup config. > > Once the devices are in the field and they get corrupted it is ugly to get > them fixed. It is possible that Karaf may not be the best choice for a > remote device that needs to come back from a power cycle reliably every > time. Which is unfortunate because other than this issue Karaf has been > great. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-Corrupt-Component-Cache-tp3905992p3906534.html > Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
