On 5/30/12 9:58 AM, Brian Topping wrote: > Have you tried this without <aggregateFeatures> ? > > JB recently applied a patch that hasn't gotten a lot of testing that is looking at the dependencies of the transitives to determine how to handle these situations, but I haven't had a lot of content to test it with other than my own. I'm about to put together the files you sent (thanks for those) and refine what you're getting out of it. > > More as I get it...
With or without aggregateFeatures it ends up with the same thing, only without the extra <feature /> tag. I notice in the code where it's adding dependencies, it says: //TODO check for duplicates? features.getFeature().addAll(includedFeatures.getFeature()); ...are you saying there's a patch that fills that out? If so, I'd be happy to help test it. Otherwise I was going to look into trying to make it do so. :) -- Benjamin Reed The OpenNMS Group http://www.opennms.org/
