Hi all, I'm really interesting too! I have try last week to make Spring 3.1.1 and Gemini-blueprint works on karaf. I finally succeeded but with a patch on gemini and now I trying to work with the gemeni team to see if they accept my patch. So if you think that blueprint from aries is better let me know. I think blueprint from aries is not able to mix standard spring + blueprint as gemini does. I think if you have a strong adherence with spring then you will have to go on gemini-blueprint as I does. I my case it is not me but a third party that use massively spring features. Any way if I have time I will try to replace aries blueprint by gemini-blueprint. I'm not sure that is possible?
Romain. 2012/6/12 bobshort <[email protected]> > I added the Spring feature dependency to my feature and it refreshes > everything on install. Thanks for the tip! > > On a slightly different topic, I'm curious about the "Aries usually works > better than Spring DM" comment? We are pretty heavy Spring users. I've > considered switching to Blueprint but haven't seen anything definitive on > what makes it better. There is a lot of Spring specific logic in our app > I'd > have to replace, particularly the use of annotations and some aop > functionality, but I'd consider it if there was a significant benefit. > > Can you elaborate on the what makes Aries better? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Install-refresh-issue-tp4024804p4024817.html > Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
