If you use a spring web app, do you really need to use spring-dm in addition ?
Why don't you just use the spring app ?

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Raman Gupta <rocketra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 03:21 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> That's a quite big problem and I'm not really aware of any way to
>> control the extender execution order.
>> The reason is that each extender can work synchronously or
>> asynchronously and there's no coordination between them, there's not
>> even a way to specify such a thing.
>> I can only see two ways out:
>>   * enhance the extenders to better cooperate, but this would require
>> enhancing all the extenders and defining some metadata to control such
>> an order (given anyone can write an extender, this would be better if
>> we had a spec for that)
>>   * do the synchronization on your own, i.e. you can detect using a
>> spring bean when the spring app will be processed and from a servlet
>> when the web app stuff will be kicked, then make sure one is waiting
>> for the other.
>>
>> The last option is the easiest one to achieve obviously, but will be
>> really tied to the extenders your using and how they behave, as if
>> both are started synchronously, you won't really have any way to do
>> some synchronization here, but iirc that's not the case here.
>
> I'm trying to do the second option (manual synchronization) as
> described here.
>
> It isn't working as Pax Web itself attempts to initialize the Spring
> context due to the Spring ContextLoaderListener that is defined in
> web.xml, which then breaks the manual synchronization.
>
> Here is the stack for the Pax Web initialization of the context:
>
> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=RTunRTkF
>
> From the stack, the general path to the bean being initialized is:
>
> swissbox BundleWatcher -> WebXmlObserver -> WebAppPublisher -> Pax Web
> Jetty -> ContextLoaderListener -> ExtenderOrderingBean.init()
>
> Then when the servlet is loaded by Pax Web, ExtenderOrderingBean
> thinks the context is good since it was "created" by Pax Web, and the
> stack which started this whole mess is again produced:
>
> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=PJvMqWRV
>
> I actually don't see where the Spring-DM extender loads the bean at all...
>
> So still looking for solutions... IMO, the behavior of Karaf 2.2.4 was
> perfect in this situation, and required no such hackish work-arounds.
>
> Regards,
> Raman



-- 
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
FuseSource, Integration everywhere
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to