The workaround I'm currently using is to modify the
enterprise-2.3.0-features.xml so that the *jpa* feature and the
*jndi*feature no longer include the org.apache.aries.util bundle. Then
everything
seems to work (the org.apache.aries.util bundle is installed anyway thanks
to startup.properties).

However, I still don't feel comfortable putting this into production until
I know what is happening.

/Bengt




2012/11/5 Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]>

> Thanks a lot JB,
>
> /Bengt
>
>
> 2012/11/5 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi Bengt,
>>
>> thanks for the detailed explanation.
>>
>> I will try to create a use case (without iPojo) to reproduce the issue
>> (in combination with jpa feature).
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 11/05/2012 04:59 PM, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
>>
>>> Some more findings...
>>>
>>> It seems like the Karaf Shell (org.apache.karaf.shell.**console) bundle
>>> uses packages from aries (e g org.apache.aries.blueprint) which in turn
>>> uses packages from org.apache.aries.util. Could it be that when
>>> the org.apache.aries.util bundle is installed as part of the jpa
>>> feature, it somehow causes a refresh which causes dependent bundles
>>> (such as the org.apache.karaf.shell.console bundle) to be rewired. This
>>> in turn would probably reinitialize the console (I'm probably using the
>>> wrong terminology here but you know what I mean...).
>>>
>>> If that is the case, then it seems highly undesirable to include
>>> the org.apache.aries.util bundle in the jpa feature.
>>>
>>> I don't have an explanation as to why this problem only occurs together
>>> with iPojo but I assume that it somehow triggers the refresh.
>>>
>>> /Bengt
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/11/5 Bengt Rodehav <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     BTW, I tried using iPojo 1.6.8 instead to see if this is a problem
>>>     introduced in later iPojo versions. I do, however, get the same
>>>     problems using iPojo 1.6.8 which implies that it's not a newly
>>>     introduced iPojo problem.
>>>
>>>     /Bengt
>>>
>>>
>>>     2012/11/5 Bengt Rodehav <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>         I'm trying to upgrade my custom Karaf distribution to Karaf
>>>         2.3.0 but have ran into some problems. It seems there is some
>>>         kind of conflict between ipojo 1.8.2 and the jpa feature -
>>>         specifically the org.apache.aries.util bundle in the jpa feature.
>>>
>>>         I install ipojo as a feature (not listed in startup.properties).
>>>         But when I do this I get the following exception:
>>>
>>>         /2012-11-05 15:51:20,251 | INFO  | l Console Thread | Console
>>>
>>>                                 | araf.shell.console.jline.**Console
>>>  199
>>>         | 14 - org.apache.karaf.shell.console - 2.3.0 | Exception caught
>>>         while executing command/
>>>         /java.lang.**UnsupportedOperationException: read() with timeout
>>>         cannot be called as non-blocking operation is disabled/
>>>         /at
>>>         jline.internal.**NonBlockingInputStream.read(**
>>> NonBlockingInputStream.java:**134)[14:org.apache.karaf.**
>>> shell.console:2.3.0]/
>>>         /at
>>>         jline.internal.**NonBlockingInputStream.read(**
>>> NonBlockingInputStream.java:**246)[14:org.apache.karaf.**
>>> shell.console:2.3.0]/
>>>         /at
>>>         jline.internal.**InputStreamReader.read(**
>>> InputStreamReader.java:259)[**14:org.apache.karaf.shell.**
>>> console:2.3.0]/
>>>         /at
>>>         jline.internal.**InputStreamReader.read(**
>>> InputStreamReader.java:196)[**14:org.apache.karaf.shell.**
>>> console:2.3.0]/
>>>         /at
>>>         jline.console.ConsoleReader.**readCharacter(ConsoleReader.**
>>> java:1974)[14:org.apache.**karaf.shell.console:2.3.0]/
>>>         /at
>>>         jline.console.ConsoleReader.**readLine(ConsoleReader.java:**
>>> 2174)[14:org.apache.karaf.**shell.console:2.3.0]/
>>>         /at
>>>         jline.console.ConsoleReader.**readLine(ConsoleReader.java:**
>>> 2098)[14:org.apache.karaf.**shell.console:2.3.0]/
>>>         /at
>>>         org.apache.karaf.shell.**console.jline.Console.**
>>> readAndParseCommand(Console.**java:235)[14:org.apache.karaf.**
>>> shell.console:2.3.0]/
>>>         /at
>>>         org.apache.karaf.shell.**console.jline.Console.run(**
>>> Console.java:171)[14:org.**apache.karaf.shell.console:2.**3.0]/
>>>         /at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.**java:662)[:1.6.0_32]/
>>>
>>>
>>>         Then it seems like Karaf (or Felix) restarts somehow since I get
>>>         another "Karaf" logo in the console. The issue can be reproduced
>>>         quite easily:
>>>
>>>         1. Download a fresh Karaf 2.3.0
>>>
>>>         2. Create a new feature containing the ipojo bundle. The easiest
>>>         way is probably to add the following lines to the
>>>         enterprise-2.3.0-features.xml in the "system" folder:
>>>
>>>              <feature name="ipojo">
>>>
>>>         <bundle>mvn:org.apache.felix/**org.apache.felix.ipojo/1.8.2</**
>>> bundle>
>>>              </feature>
>>>
>>>         3. Edit the etc/org.apache.karaf.features.**cfg as follows:
>>>
>>>              featuresBoot=config,ssh,**management,kar,jpa,ipojo
>>>
>>>         Some other obeservations:
>>>
>>>         - If I switch the jpa and the ipojo features I get other
>>> exceptions.
>>>
>>>         - The org.apache.aries.util bundle is part of the jpa feature
>>>         (start level 30) but it is also present in startup.properties
>>>         (start level 20).
>>>
>>>         - If I remove the org.apache.aries.util bundle from the jpa
>>>         feature then things seem to work.
>>>
>>>         - If I install ipojo by using startup.properties instead of
>>>         using a feature then things seem to work.
>>>
>>>         The last two observations might imply that org.apache.aries.util
>>>         and ipojo must be resolved at the same time (start levels do not
>>>         make any difference).
>>>
>>>         I'm not sure if this post belongs here or in Felix mailing list.
>>>         However, since it seems to involve the enterprise features that
>>>         is part of Karaf I try here first. It's very confusing. Although
>>>         I have found a couple of work-arounds I don't feel comfortable
>>>         using them since I don't know what is happening.
>>>
>>>         Does anyone have a clue?
>>>
>>>         /Bengt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> [email protected]
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>

Reply via email to