I propose to simply switch to commons daemon for karaf 3.1 and do no
changes for earlier versions.
So this means ARM support is a bit delayed but it is a lot less work.

Christian

On 07.02.2013 13:28, [email protected] wrote:
> Agree,
>
> my proposal would be:
> - keep JSW as it is for Karaf 2.3.1 and 3.0.0.RC1
> - provide ARM support (by cross compilation) in Karaf 2.3.2 and 3.0.1
> - provide commons-daemon support in Karaf 2.4.0 and 3.1.0
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 2013-02-07 13:20, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>> Ok, 
>> so we do have a fully functional "wrapper" based on commons-deamon at
>> hand but don't use it (yet). 
>> We should start a vote to switch to it for trunk and maybe do a
>> ARM cross-compile for 2.3.
>>
>> regards, Achim 
>>
>> 2013/2/7 <[email protected] [7]>
>>
>>> As I said "long" time ago ;), I already have the commons-daemon
>>> module ready for the trunk.
>>>
>>> Anyway, my point is that we can do both: cross compile for JSW (at
>>> least for Karaf 2.3.x), commons-daemon for trunk (and leave the
>>> choice between commons-daemon and JSW).
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 2013-02-07 12:21, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>
>>>> So the idea should rather be to completely change to
>>>> commons-deamon
>>>> instead of the current approach for the wrapper bundle?
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:57 AM, <[email protected] [3] [3]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>>>
>>>>> It should be possible to cross compile on ARM for Tanuki JSW.
>>>>> We can create a Jira about that and I can tackle that.
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIR, commons-daemon provides ARM support "by default".
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2013-02-07 11:47, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> @Robert: JRE properties had been pushed (thanks JB)
>>>>>> @JB: Do you think we can cross compiile the wrapper scripts
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> ARM
>>>>>> the same way you've done for windows 64 bit?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Kind regards,
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:39 AM, <[email protected] [1] [1] [1]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Robert,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> very interesting, thanks for the sharing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FYI, I'm upgrading jre.properties in both Karaf 2.3.x and
>>>>>>> trunk.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2013-02-06 23:07, Robert Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Greetings!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I managed to get Karaf running smoothly on the Raspberry
>>>>>>>> Pi
>>>>>>>> against
>>>>>>>> the Sun JDK 8 Preview; I'd love to work with the Karaf
>>>>>>>> community
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> make this an easier process, as right now there are a
>>>>>>>> couple
>>>>>>>> modifications that need to be done to several core files
>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>> everything runs nicely.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If any of the developers are interested in getting these
>>>>>>>> tweaks
>>>>>>>> integrated into Karaf, I'd be thrilled to help out in any
>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> can.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Links:
>>>>>> ------
>>>>>> [1] mailto:[email protected] [2] [2]
>>>>
>>>> Links:
>>>> ------
>>>> [1] mailto:[email protected] [4]
>>>> [2] mailto:[email protected] [5]
>>>> [3] mailto:[email protected] [6]
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/ [8]> Committer & PMC
>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/ [9]>
>> Committer & Project Lead
>>  OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
>> <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home [10]> Commiter &
>> Project Lead
>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/ [11]>
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] mailto:[email protected]
>> [2] mailto:[email protected]
>> [3] mailto:[email protected]
>> [4] mailto:[email protected]
>> [5] mailto:[email protected]
>> [6] mailto:[email protected]
>> [7] mailto:[email protected]
>> [8] http://karaf.apache.org/
>> [9] http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/
>> [10] http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home
>> [11] http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/
>


-- 
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Open Source Architect
http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to