OK, I will report it. Previously I didn't have to use 4 slashes, only 2.

[image: i2cat]
Julio C. Barrera Juez
Office phone: +34 93 357 99 27
Distributed Applications and Networks Area (DANA)
i2CAT Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
http://dana.i2cat.net


On 14 November 2013 10:25, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> you might report and issue, though I'm not sure it is really a Karaf
> issue.
> It's been quite a long time since I tried this, but afairc this is typical
> for a Windows Environment to have 4 backslashes in parameters, cause you'll
> need 2 backslashes for an escaped backslash and since it's a string
> interpreted you'll need 2 backslashes resulting in 4 in your scripts.path
> variable :/
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
> 2013/11/14 Julio Carlos Barrera Juez <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I was using Karaf in a quite old fashioned version 2.2.2 and I have
>> recently updated to version 2.2.11. With Linux I have no problems, but with
>> Windows I'm experiencing weird problems using session variables in Karaf
>> CLI.
>>
>> Defining a session variable containing a path like:
>>
>>     scripts.path=C:\\data
>>
>> I get with Karaf 2.2.2:
>>
>>     C:\data
>>
>> And with Karaf 2.2.11:
>>
>>     C:data
>>
>>
>> It seems like the previous escaped paths are now lost. Is there a way to
>> use paths inside session variables in Windows?
>>
>> I have just realized that in Karaf 2.2.11 it is necessary to double
>> escape each slash:
>>
>> scripts.path=C:\\\\data
>>
>>     C:\data
>>
>> Is this behaviour a bug? Should I report it?
>>
>> [image: i2cat]
>> Julio C. Barrera Juez
>> Office phone: +34 93 357 99 27
>> Distributed Applications and Networks Area (DANA)
>> i2CAT Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
>> http://dana.i2cat.net
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> Project Lead
> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
> Commiter & Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>

Reply via email to