Hi JB, Thanks. Is an instance anything more than the collection of files in the instances directory? I.e. if I just created the files there myself would it be recognised by the instance module?
Tanks again Jim On 5 Feb 2014, at 14:40, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > you can already do that by changing the configuration file. > > What I do: in etc/custom.properties, I set default.interface property and I > use it in all other configuration files (${default.interface}). > > I planned to add -b option to easily change the bound interface/IP (actually > setting the default.interface property). > The main issue is for application "outside" of Karaf itself (Pax Web, Camel, > etc). > > I will resume action on this: > 1/ commit/push my change to use it (I changed the default config file and > some blueprint descriptors) > 2/ see what we can do on the Pax Web side > > I keep you posted. > > Regards > JB > > On 02/05/2014 11:29 AM, Jim Talbut wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to create a bunch of Karaf instances with each running on a >> dedicated IP address with the same ports rather than all using all IP >> addresses and different ports. >> For our infrastructure this is much easier to manage (giving a greater >> consistency with only one variable for each instance). >> >> The issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1128 describes >> what I want (if the last sentence is implemented), but it's not clear >> whether that's what the reporter wanted and it hasn't had any movement >> in 2 years. >> >> So: >> Are there any fundamental issues with having instances running on >> dedicated IP addresses? >> What's the easiest way for me to get it? >> >> If an instance is just the files under the instances directory I can >> easily write a bash script that does what I need. >> If there is a desire to get the ability into the main karaf I'm happy to >> write a patch for the instance feature as long as it (or some corrected >> version of it :) gets included fairly soon. >> Or, I'm very happy to leave it to someone else to make the change. >> >> This is for a new deployment, so I'm only looking at 3.X and I need it >> usable within a month (quite happy with a temporary hack or SNAPSHOT >> deployment or instance on that timescale). >> >> Thanks. >> >> Jim > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
