Karaf dev team is currently calling a vote to karaf-2.3.4, You may want to
try it out  and provide feedback

-D


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Chris Geer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Dan. Since 1.1.1 seems to have never been released I tried to
> upgrade to 1.2.0 but that broke the container pretty good. I see that Karaf
> 2.3.4 has been upgraded to core 1.4.0 so hopefully that will fix it. Any
> news on when 2.3.4 will be released?
>
> Since 1.1.1 isn't even in JIRA, any idea what ticket actually fixed this
> issue?
>
> Chris
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Dan Tran <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> see if this help
>>
>>
>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Orderly-shutting-down-services-td4027336.html
>>
>> -D
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Chris Geer <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> JB,
>>>
>>> It's the default config.properties files.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> did you change something in the etc config file or it's the default one
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/14/2014 06:54 PM, Chris Geer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We just upgraded our container from Karaf 2.2.10 to 2.3.3 and are now
>>>>> having some significant issues on shutdown. Previously, everything
>>>>> would
>>>>> shut down in a normal order but now for some reasons things with lower
>>>>> start levels are shutting down first. Our big problem is ActiveMQ. We
>>>>> have our activemq broker starting with a start level of 60 and our
>>>>> normal bundles (mostly camel) starting at 80. But on shutdown the first
>>>>> thing that shows up in the logs is this.
>>>>>
>>>>> 23:46:38,243 | INFO  | Thread-2         | Main
>>>>>    |  -  -  | Karaf shutdown socket: received shutdown command.
>>>>> Stopping
>>>>> framework...
>>>>> 23:46:38,266 | INFO  | FelixShutdown    | BlueprintExtender
>>>>>     | 7 - org.apache.aries.blueprint.core - 1.1.0 | Destroying
>>>>> BlueprintContainer for bundle activemq-broker.xml
>>>>> 23:46:38,290 | INFO  | FelixShutdown    | BrokerService
>>>>>     | 133 - org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi - 5.9.0 | Apache
>>>>> ActiveMQ
>>>>> 5.9.0 (default, ID:CXTPRO-CG.local-49654-1392332684735-0:1) is
>>>>> shutting down
>>>>> 23:46:38,368 | INFO  | FelixShutdown    | TransportConnector
>>>>>    | 133 - org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi - 5.9.0 | Connector
>>>>> openwire stopped
>>>>> 23:46:38,436 | INFO  | FelixShutdown    | TransportConnector
>>>>>    | 133 - org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi - 5.9.0 | Connector stomp
>>>>> stopped
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As you can imagine that causes problems because now that the broker
>>>>> doesn't exist the bundles that use it start throwing errors and
>>>>> in-flight transactions are failing.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 23:46:38,440 | INFO  | : vm://default#0 | PooledConnectionFactory
>>>>>     | 133 - org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi - 5.9.0 | Expiring
>>>>> connection ActiveMQConnection
>>>>> {id=ID:CXTPRO-CG.local-49654-1392332684735-3:1,clientId=ID:
>>>>> CXTPRO-CG.local-49654-1392332684735-2:8,started=false}
>>>>> on IOException:
>>>>> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportDisposedIOException: peer
>>>>> (vm://default#1) stopped.
>>>>> 23:46:38,444 | WARN  | n-notifications] |
>>>>> faultJmsMessageListenerContainer | 163 - org.springframework.jms -
>>>>> 3.2.4.RELEASE | Setup of JMS message listener invoker failed for
>>>>> destination 'permission-notifications' - trying to recover. Cause: peer
>>>>> (vm://default#3) stopped.
>>>>> 23:46:38,444 | WARN  | t-notifications] | PooledSession
>>>>>     | 133 - org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi - 5.9.0 | Caught
>>>>> exception
>>>>> trying rollback() when putting session back into the pool, will
>>>>> invalidate. javax.jms.IllegalStateException: The Session is closed
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there anything we can do to restore an orderly shutdown order?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to