What's the advantage in switching to DS in Karaf 4.x then? On Mar 4, 2014 2:37 AM, "Achim Nierbeck" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think there are any awailable yet, > and actually I don't expect there to be much of a difference. > Both are basically doing the same thing. > Blueprint does have an extender that will do the wiring for you, > so there might be a "overhead" on the start of the bundle ... > but I don't expect there to be an overhead later on, or at least not > significant. > DS is just a "convenience-wrapper" for standard OSGi technology. > During build-time the BND or what ever will transform the annotations to > Service-Trackers and Service Registrations. > > At the end it boils down to services and service-trackers that are > "hidden" for the user, either by a xml syntax and an extender, or an > annotation and a build time enhancement. > > regards, Achim > > > > 2014-03-03 22:55 GMT+01:00 asookazian2 <[email protected]>: > >> Any info on perf metrics on DS vs. BP? thx. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/performance-metrics-blueprint-vs-declarative-services-in-karaf-3-0-x-tp4032028.html >> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > -- > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & > Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master > >
