Ok, thanks for that hint. 

Regards, Laci

> Am 19.06.2014 um 20:44 schrieb Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]>:
> 
> Don't do that, require bundle is the worst you can do. 
> If you use that you loose all the benefits of OSGi.
> Stick to the standard import and export maybe a dynamic-import every now and 
> than. But never ever use require bundle.
> 
> Regards, Achim
> 
> sent from mobile device
> 
> Am 19.06.2014 16:35 schrieb "Laci Gaspar" <[email protected]>:
>> Ok, just to close this... it was a problem with our deployment server, so 
>> sorry for the disturbance.
>> 
>> But anyhow I learned that the Import-Package / Export-Package elements are 
>> best left alone. What I needed was only the <Require-Bundle> configuration 
>> in our pom.
>> 
>> Thanks and regards
>> Laci
>> 
>>> On 19.06.2014 11:07, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>>> In such cases it sometimes help to issue the refresh command.
>>> If you update a bundle another bundle using it, like a central cxf or camel 
>>> bundle (in case of camel the camel-core) are still bound to the "old" 
>>> uninstalled bundle. In those cases it helps to refresh these bundles after 
>>> an update of the bundle containing either cxf or camel-routes.
>>> In your case I'm not sure which bundle does actually stick to an old one 
>>> therefore do a general refresh, which does refresh all bundles (it actually 
>>> does a re-wiring of the bundles)
>>> 
>>> regards, Achim

Reply via email to