This is because with 3.0.2 the pax web features are now better proxied in Karaf. And you really should make use of the http or war feature instead.
regards, Achim 2014-10-08 12:17 GMT+02:00 Marcus Bond <[email protected]>: > Sure, I will try to do this.. Notice however that if I add bootFeature > jetty on 3.01 it will show a Jetty error page (expected) on 8181 but in > 3.0.2-SNAPSHOT it doesn't. > > I will try as you suggested and then try the http feature and get back to > you. > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> by the way, could you try to put pax-jetty in the boot features instead >> of jetty (jetty is an "alias" to pax-jetty) ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 10/08/2014 10:45 AM, Marcus Bond wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've built the 3.0.2-SNAPSHOT from source but in the >>> assemblies/apache-karaf pom I've added jetty as a bootFeature. The build >>> works fine but the problem is that when I run it Jetty does not appear >>> to be available on either port 8181 or port 8080. Is there anything else >>> required? (Normally there is a jetty error page because there are no >>> deployed web resources, but this time nothing). >>> >>> Regards, >>> Marcus. >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > > -- Apache Member Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
