Hi Achim Can u tell me more about your DS idea ?
Thanks Le 13 nov. 2014 21:32, "Achim Nierbeck" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi, > > if you use a service tracker you don't need a while loop, cause it will > "active" in the second the service is available. > Best to do that without blueprint, blueprint does have a graceperiod. > Maybe DS is more suitable for this. > > regards, Achim > > 2014-11-13 21:20 GMT+01:00 Matthieu Vincent <[email protected]>: > >> Hi >> >> I was thinking about using either activator or tracker. >> >> But in both cases, if business service is unavailable the bundle will go >> in failure. So I need to use some monitoring to restart bundle after a >> while. >> Other option can be a kind of while loop to wait fort service but i dont >> really like the idea. >> >> I'm mostly based on spring configuration. >> Le 13 nov. 2014 20:00, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> Hi, >>> >>> maybe you can manage using the Activator to check the state of the >>> service or other bundle. >>> >>> Can you describe a bit what you use (blueprint, DS, etc) ? >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 11/13/2014 07:50 PM, Matthieu Vincent wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> My problem is thar i've got a bundle starting consumer en JMS queues >>>> that must wait for my business bundle to start which can be "long" so i >>>> need the first one to wait thé second. >>>> >>>> Features and start level didn't fix my problem. I've already tried. >>>> >>>> Mat >>>> >>>> Le 13 nov. 2014 19:34, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hi Matthieu, >>>> >>>> you can use start-level, but honestly, I would recommend to use >>>> features. >>>> >>>> Let say, you have bundle1 and bundle2, where bundle2 depends to >>>> bundle1. >>>> >>>> You can define: >>>> >>>> <feature version="1.0" name="feature1"> >>>> <bundle>.../bundle1</bundle> >>>> </feature> >>>> >>>> <feature version="1.0" name="feature2"> >>>> <feature version="1.0">feature1</__feature> >>>> <bundle>../bundle2</bundle> >>>> </feature> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On 11/13/2014 06:39 PM, Matthieu Vincent wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I'd like to know which is the better way to have some >>>> dependency >>>> between 2 bundles so that a bundle will not start before its >>>> dependency >>>> is in an active state ? >>>> >>>> Thanks for answers >>>> Mat >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >> > > > -- > > Apache Member > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & > Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> > > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master > >
