JB,

No worries; I actually use them both interchangeably.  That being
said, I wouldn't have been offended anyway :-)


Best regards,

Steve

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> You're welcome.
>
> And by the way, sorry about my mistake on your name (Steve instead of
> Steven).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 12/11/2014 04:11 PM, Steve wrote:
>>
>> JB,
>>
>> I very much appreciate you taking the time to respond to my inquiry.
>> The link you provided was most helpful and clarified the specification
>> version support without ambiguity; I'll proceed with using 4.3.0
>> without reservations.
>>
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Steven
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> the release schedule page contains the OSGi version support for each
>>> major
>>> branches:
>>>
>>> http://karaf.apache.org/index/community/releases-schedule.html
>>>
>>> So, for Karaf 2.3.x, OSGi version is 4.3 (compatible with 4.2), and Java
>>> 7.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/11/2014 03:52 PM, Steve wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Karaf developers,
>>>>
>>>> I’m currently working on a management-agent for JBoss Fuse 6.0 (which
>>>> leverages Karaf 2.3.0.redhat-60024).  Up until this point I’ve been
>>>> leveraging version 4.2.0 of the org.osgi/org.osgi.core artifact which
>>>> has worked without issue but lacks support for generics.  My usage of
>>>> version 4.2.0 of the aforementioned artifact was based on the fact
>>>> that Felix 3.x was certified as R4.2 compliant.  Yesterday I happened
>>>> to be looking at the Karaf dependencies matrix and noticed that the
>>>> “osgi” dependency for Karaf 2.3.0 was actually at 4.3.0 (something I
>>>> had been previously unaware of).   I contacted RedHat commercial
>>>> support for a clarification and they stated that while the version of
>>>> Felix used by Karaf 2.3.0 had passed the R4.3 compliance tests, it had
>>>> yet to be certified.  This makes sense as I can imagine becoming
>>>> certified by the OSGi alliance is non-trivial and may be an effort
>>>> only done once per major specification release.
>>>>
>>>> That being said, I was hoping to get Karaf developers to weigh in
>>>> regarding their opinion in regards to which version of the
>>>> org.osgi/org.osgi.core artifact is recommended for use within Karaf
>>>> 2.3.0; version 4.2.0 or 4.3.0?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Steven
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to