waddyamean? there's a whole community out there YOU FORTH LOVE IF HONK THEN
http://recursivetees.spreadshirt.com/you-forth-love-if-honk-then-on-dark-choice-A4363571 > Nice idea Chris, you'll then be the only one that will be able to > understand felix dependency error messages > > 2014-12-18 13:34 GMT+01:00 <[email protected]>: >> >> In any case Milan is misinterpreting the message. Felix is saying that >> it >> could not find a provider for the package my.package.api with version >= >> 1.0.0 but not >= 2.0.0; in other words he "expects" 1.x.x and he "found" >> nothing that matches his expectations. I have to admit that LDAP syntax >> is >> not ideally matched to the human brain, maybe OSGi should switch to >> using >> FORTH? Something like: >> >> osgi.wiring.package dup dup my.package.api = 1.0.0 >= 2.0.0 < and and >> >> ;-) >> >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > That message is from Apache Felix but not Karaf. >> > >> > You may need post request there. >> > ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ >> > Freeman(Yue) Fang >> > >> > Red Hat, Inc. >> > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >> > >> > >> > >> > On 2014-12-18, at ä¸å7:38, Milan Tomic wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> If you could please change error message from: >> >> >> >> Unable to resolve 140.0: missing requirement [140.0] >> >> osgi.wiring.package; >> >> >> (&(osgi.wiring.package=my.package.api)(version>=1.0.0)(!(version>=2.0.0))) >> >> >> >> to: >> >> >> >> Unable to resolve 140.0: missing requirement [140.0] >> >> osgi.wiring.package; (&(osgi.wiring.package=my.package.api)(found: >> >> version>=1.0.0)(!(expected: version>=2.0.0))) >> >> >> >> (I added "found" and "expected") >> >> >> >> because it is not intuitive and each time I got this error message I >> >> have to search for its meaning. >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> >> Milan >> > >> > >> >> >> > > -- > Charlie Mordant > > Full OSGI/EE stack made with Karaf: > https://github.com/OsgiliathEnterprise/net.osgiliath.parent >
