Hmmmm, I want to believe you, but the JDBC locking also says it is Active/Passive. Maybe you mean container level locking?
In any case, if the service bundle is listed in the cluster bundle map (i.e. shows in the results for "cluster:bundle-list") on child-1, why doesn't it get synced to child-1 when child-1 finishes loading up and becomes the master? Seems like we are inches away from it working the way I want it to. Steve -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Bundle-sync-in-cluster-with-failover-tp4038642p4038644.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
