JB,
In my use case etc/jetty.xml was created by feature:install cave-server and 
org.osgi.service.http.port does not exist in etc/*.  

What is interesting, when the port in etc/jetty.xml is changed to 9191, cave 
http wrapper responds on port 8181 and 9191.  Bug? 

***
* From Karaf.log
***
2015-05-01 11:28:52,175 | INFO  | FelixStartLevel  | Activator                  
      | 85 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-runtime - 3.1.4 | EventAdmin support is 
not available, no servlet events will be posted!
2015-05-01 11:28:52,186 | INFO  | FelixStartLevel  | Activator                  
      | 85 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-runtime - 3.1.4 | LogService support 
enabled, log events will be created.
2015-05-01 11:28:52,195 | INFO  | FelixStartLevel  | Activator                  
      | 85 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-runtime - 3.1.4 | Pax Web started
2015-05-01 11:28:52,495 | INFO  | pool-6-thread-1  | Server                     
      | 77 - org.eclipse.jetty.aggregate.jetty-all-server - 8.1.15.v20140411 | 
jetty-8.1.15.v20140411
2015-05-01 11:28:52,659 | INFO  | pool-6-thread-1  | AbstractConnector          
      | 77 - org.eclipse.jetty.aggregate.jetty-all-server - 8.1.15.v20140411 | 
Started [email protected]:9191
2015-05-01 11:28:52,660 | INFO  | pool-6-thread-1  | JettyServerImpl            
      | 86 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jetty - 3.1.4 | Pax Web available at 
[0.0.0.0]:[9191]
2015-05-01 11:28:52,661 | INFO  | pool-6-thread-1  | JettyServerImpl            
      | 86 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jetty - 3.1.4 | Pax Web available at 
[0.0.0.0]:[8181]
2015-05-01 11:28:52,668 | INFO  | pool-6-thread-1  | AbstractConnector          
      | 77 - org.eclipse.jetty.aggregate.jetty-all-server - 8.1.15.v20140411 | 
Started [email protected]:8181
2015-05-01 11:28:53,446 | INFO  | FelixStartLevel  | HttpServiceFactoryImpl     
      | 85 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-runtime - 3.1.4 | Binding bundle: 
[org.apache.karaf.cave.server.http [111]] to http service

***
* Grep for port number in etc/*
***
[etc]$ grep 8181 *
[etc]$ grep 9191 *
jetty.xml:                    <Property name="jetty.port" default="9191" />
[etc]$ 


***
* Steps to recreate
***
Steps to I used to install a cave instance and "app_patching" repostory in 
Karaf 3.0.3. 
- Connect to the root instance of Karaf
bin/client -u karaf

- Create and start an instance called repository while connected to the root 
instance.
instance:create --location ${user.home}/cave-repository --ssh-port 8106 
repository
instance:start repository 

- Connect to the repository instance and install cave then create a repository.
instance:connect -u karaf -p karaf repository 
feature:repo-add mvn:org.apache.karaf.cave/apache-karaf-cave/3.0.0/xml/features 
  
feature:install cave-server
cave:repository-create app_patching
cave:repositories

At this point you can shutdown the repository instance and update the port in 
${user.home}/cave-repository/etc/jetty.xml

Paul Spencer



> On May 1, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> both are possible: it depends of the org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg file.
> 
> The org.osgi.service.http.port contains the port.
> 
> For instance, containing 8888.
> 
> In the jetty.xml, you have something like:
> 
>              <Set name="port">
>                  <Property name="jetty.port" default="8181"/>
>              </Set>
> 
> In that case, the 8181 port number is not used, instead it's the 8888 (as 
> defined in the property).
> 
> Anyway, Cave server itself doesn't provision etc/jetty.xml (just a CXF config 
> file).
> 
> Can you check that this jetty.xml doesn't come from another feature (or your 
> provisioning) ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On 04/30/2015 11:35 PM, Paul Spencer wrote:
>> I noticed the TCP port opened by the Cave HTTP server is defined in 
>> /etc/jetty.xml instead of a configured property.
>> 
>> Is this:
>>  1 - Bug, because it should be configurable property
>>  2 - Bug, because it should us the pax-web port ( pid = org.ops4j.pax.web 
>> property = org.osgi.service.http.port)
>>  3 - Documentation bug
>>  4 - Enhancement with the expected behavior of ___ (1 or 2)
>> 
>> Paul Spencer
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to