Cellar DOSGi does the same as CXF DOSGi without the overhead of
SOAP/REST (directly using hazelcast NIO/serialization).
In the same JVM, you can increase the throughput with multiple
consumer/thread on the same service. It's not really better performance,
but more throughput.
Regards
JB
On 08/27/2015 09:39 AM, hsinchen wrote:
For a consumer bundle to access the provider bundle within a JVM, the
performance should be better than the two standalone (consumer and provider)
applications deployed in two JVMs with SOAP or REST. With DOSGi (Remote
OSGi) by CXF, it goes with SOAP or REST, too. Then, the performance is the
same just like the two standalone applications with SOAP or REST. Is it
right? If yes, any of ways to get better performance near the same JVM.
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Remote-OSGi-Performance-Compared-to-Same-JVM-or-Two-JVM-tp4042077.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
