does that imply you only can use the annotations, and rely on a generated
blueprint.xml?


2015-09-16 11:05 GMT+02:00 Christian Schneider <[email protected]>:

> Hi Jochen,
>
> yes this is correct. Aries JPA 2 only uses the annotations.
> In addition I am currently working on a new Aries Transaction 3 that will
> then also only use the jta 1.2 annotations.
>
> This means that the whole JPA/JTA setup will then be based on the standard
> set of annotations. The advantage is that you do not need any Aries
> specific imports in your bundle.
>
> I will also release a new maven-blueprint-plugin version that is adapted
> for the new JPA and JTA versions and creates the blueprint xml from CDI +
> JEE annotations. So in the end you can use blueprint with almost the same
> set of annotations like JEE.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On 16.09.2015 10:50, jochenw wrote:
>
>> Does this mean that now it is *mandatory *to define the persistence unit
>> per
>> annotation, and it is no longer possible to define it in the blueprint
>> file?
>>
>> Is this a bug of a feature? Or, in other words, does it make sense to
>> open a
>> Jira for Aries if I want to get the blueprint.xml mechanism back (the
>> respective entries seem to be missing in the xsd file)?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Jochen
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Bundle-is-waiting-for-namespace-handlers-http-aries-apache-org-xmlns-jpa-v1-0-0-tp4042275p4042618.html
>> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Open Source Architect
> http://www.talend.com
>
>


-- 

Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>

Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master

Reply via email to