Sure kar was an easy one. We're waiting on the 3.0.5 release so we're 
overriding it to load our patched core bundle instead. Yes this is something 
that we have to constantly maintain as releases increase :(

  <feature name="kar" version="3.7.5" description="Provide KAR (KARaf archive) 
support" resolver="(obr)">
    <bundle 
start-level="30">mvn:org.apache.karaf.kar/org.apache.karaf.kar.core/3.0.5-p</bundle>
    <bundle 
start-level="30">mvn:org.apache.karaf.kar/org.apache.karaf.kar.command/3.0.3</bundle>
    <bundle 
start-level="30">mvn:org.apache.karaf.deployer/org.apache.karaf.deployer.kar/3.0.3</bundle>
  </feature>

Http is another one we override as Karaf in some of our products is running 
within an existing Application Server and we bridge the HttpService out to the 
Servlet environment supplied by the server (felix-http-bridge). That one is 
more involved as some of the features declare a specific version of http so 
we've overridden them as well to direct them to our customized version.

-Nick

From: Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 2:50 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: features-add-to-repository and multiple versions of a feature

Hi Nick,

I'm not quite sure what you're doing, so let's try clear some question marks 
from my view.
core features in higher version, are you merely updating to newer available 
versions or are you creating "new" versions which will collide in future if 
those
bundles are actually bumped to that version?

Is it possible that some other bundles/features do have requirements for 
certain features which are exactly the version from the std. repo.
As an example take the http feature and the http commands, those commands 
require certain pax-web- bundles in certain versions. So might it
be possible that you have some "transitive" dependencies in there somewhere?

Could you give us a view of the customized features you got?

regards, Achim


2015-09-17 16:50 GMT+02:00 Nick Baker 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Hey All,

We're supplying customized versions for some of the core features: http, kar in 
order to provide different bundles. These features are all versioned higher 
than the stock ones and are indeed being used instead of the stock ones at 
runtime.

The issue is that in assembly these override features' bundles are not being 
added to the system/ repository. Production environments are downloading them 
from maven which is unacceptable for our customers. It seems that 
features-add-to-repository isn't honoring the highest-version feature the same 
way the FeaturesService is.

Anyone run into this one before? I'm about to create a bogus feature with these 
bundles, referenced in the assembly simply to get around the problem but it's 
not a long-term solution.

Thanks,
Nick



--

Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & 
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>

Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master

Reply via email to